Rajiv Jain Goes All-In on Energy: Big Oil & Canadian Oil Sands Take Center Stage
GQG Partners made sweeping new additions in energy during Q1 2026, initiating positions in OXY, SU, CNQ, DVN, and CVE while reshaping the portfolio around defensive, real-asset holdings. Total AUM stands at $46.6B, concentrated in just 20 positions.

- GQG Partners overhauled its portfolio in Q1 2026, initiating $4.3B in energy names including OXY, SU, and CNQ
- Tech and IT services were fully liquidated as Jain shifts to real-asset defense
Rajiv Jain is known for simplifying his bets precisely when markets turn turbulent. In Q1 2026, GQG Partners proved that instinct once again — compressing $46.6B in AUM into just 20 holdings. The direction was unambiguous: sell technology, buy what's in the ground.
Top 5 Holdings — As of Q1 2026
- PM: $8.3B (13.1%)
- ENB: $4.1B (6.5%)
- CB: $4.0B (6.4%)
- PBR: $3.6B (5.7%)
- T: $2.4B (3.7%)
Key Trading Activity This Quarter
PM retained its commanding position at the top of the portfolio with an $8.3B allocation (13.1% weight). ENB, CB, and PBR each followed at roughly $4.0B, while large-cap U.S. telecom names T and VZ also held prominent spots. Notably, CVX saw its weight surge 631%, vaulting the position into a major portfolio holding. PBR was added to by 28%, reaffirming conviction in Brazilian state-owned energy assets.
- Five new energy positions initiated simultaneously — OXY, SU, CNQ, DVN, and CVE added in a combined ~$4.3B concentrated buy
- CVX weight expanded 631% — elevated from a minor holding to a ~$2.1B core position, signaling high conviction in energy
- IT services & consumer staples fully liquidated — CTSH, INFY, ACN, and CL exited entirely, reducing growth equity exposure to near zero
New purchases were concentrated squarely in energy. OXY ($1.2B), SU ($1.1B), CNQ ($850M), DVN ($810M), and CVE ($710M) were all initiated in a single quarter, sweeping in both Canadian and U.S. oil producers at once. Meanwhile, CTSH, CL, INFY, ACN, and GGAL were fully liquidated. This represents a structural rotation — exiting IT services and consumer staples entirely and redeploying capital into hard energy assets.
Outlook: Positioning Real Assets as a Hedge Against Inflation & Geopolitical Risk
GQG's portfolio overhaul reads less like a routine sector rotation and more like a deliberate macro positioning call. A 20-stock portfolio built around energy, telecom, insurance, and infrastructure is engineered to defend cash flows in an environment of sticky interest rates, geopolitical instability, and a weakening dollar. The extreme concentration amplifies single-stock risk, but this is precisely Rajiv Jain's signature style — high conviction, high concentration — and it appears to be fully engaged once again.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did GQG Partners make such aggressive energy purchases?
The move is widely read as a strategic push to secure stable, real-asset-backed cash flows amid persistent inflation and rising geopolitical tensions. Canadian and U.S. oil producers like OXY, SU, and CNQ offer high dividend yields and concentrated upside exposure to rising oil prices.
Why did GQG fully exit IT services names like CTSH, INFY, and ACN?
Slowing demand for traditional IT outsourcing in a high-rate environment, combined with structural headwinds from the AI transition, are seen as key drivers. GQG liquidated sectors with elevated growth uncertainty and redeployed capital into dividend-paying, real-asset-oriented holdings.
Smart Money Briefing
Weekly summaries of Wall Street guru moves and crypto whale activity.







